Silver Under Control: China’s 2026 Export Rules Could Reshape the Market

Three Silver Bars - Brixton Metals

China introduced a new export system for silver on January 1, 2026. It is initially set to apply until December 31, 2026. (As we reported.) However, it is expected that this regulation will be extended if it achieves the success desired by the Beijing government. And once one delves a little deeper into the ‘technical’ aspects of this new regulation, it quickly becomes clear that the strategic success of this measure is absolutely certain.

For China, and indeed for the entire rest of the world, a great deal is at stake here, because in the last two decades, the Middle Kingdom has not only built up enormous capacities for silver refining but has also ensured, through clever contracts with silver producers, that these capacities are fully utilized.

As in the field of solar module manufacturing, China has also planned and acted extremely generously here. Not only have capacities been built that far exceed China’s domestic demand, but silver, lead, and zinc mines have also been paid prices for their ore or concentrate that were significantly above the world market price.

High Investments in Mid-Term Strategic Dominance

This extra remuneration was gratefully accepted by producers, as the Chinese premiums helped many producers economically survive the difficult years before 2024.

While China paid a rather high price for these contracts for a long time, the strategic benefit was always significantly greater and ultimately justified these ‘investments in strategic dominance.’ The result was a development similar to what was observed in the rare earths sector in the 1990s.

Paying higher prices to silver sellers, especially from South America, had two consequences that perfectly suited the Beijing government’s plans. Firstly, strong and deep business relationships were formed with the producers. Giving them up now makes no real sense for either side, creating a certain moat against Western competition.

Rare Earths as a Model for Silver

In addition, competitors from Europe and the USA were increasingly pushed out of the market. Because China was willing to pay significantly higher purchase prices for the ore or concentrate, they found less and less material available for processing.

This created negative economies of scale for Western competitors, while the Chinese industry benefited from higher processing volumes. As a result of this development, more and more smelters in the West withdrew from the business, which was no longer profitable for them, and exited the market.

As a result, China is currently in the comfortable position of being responsible for approximately 70% of the world’s refined silver. China’s dominance is therefore not quite as extensive as with rare earths, where this share stands at approximately 90%, but still significant enough to strategically control the West. For whoever determines who receives silver and in what quantities indirectly also dictates the development, for better or worse, of industries in other countries.

Keywords

Featured Company

Categories

Further Links

Never miss important news again.

Receive exclusive updates on exciting commodity companies, market analyses, and investment opportunities directly in your inbox.

By submitting the form, you agree that your contact details will be processed for sending the newsletter.

Disclaimer

I. Information Function and Disclaimer: GOLDINVEST Consulting GmbH offers editors, agencies, and companies the opportunity to publish comments, analyses, and news on www.goldinvest.de. The content serves exclusively for general information and does not replace individual, professional investment advice. It does not constitute financial analyses or sales offers, nor is it a solicitation to buy or sell securities. Decisions made based on the published information are entirely at your own risk. No contractual relationship arises between GOLDINVEST Consulting GmbH and the readers or users, as our information relates exclusively to the company and not to personal investment decisions.

II. Risk Disclosure: The acquisition of securities involves high risks, which can lead to the total loss of the capital invested. Despite careful research, GOLDINVEST Consulting GmbH and its authors assume no liability for financial losses or for the content’s guarantee regarding timeliness, accuracy, appropriateness, and completeness of the published information. Please also note our further terms of use.

III. Conflicts of Interest: In accordance with §34b WpHG and §48f para. 5 BörseG (Austria), we point out that GOLDINVEST Consulting GmbH, as well as its partners, clients, or employees, hold shares in the aforementioned companies. Furthermore, a consulting or other service agreement exists between these companies and GOLDINVEST Consulting GmbH, and it is possible that GOLDINVEST Consulting GmbH may buy or sell shares of these companies at any time. These circumstances can lead to conflicts of interest, as the aforementioned companies compensate GOLDINVEST Consulting GmbH for its reporting.